Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the name of a company struck off the register under section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 should be restored under section 560(6), and whether restoration should be made subject to compliance with filing requirements and costs.
Analysis: The company showed that it was a running concern, had audited accounts, sales tax and excise records, and income-tax acknowledgments, and had moved the petition within the prescribed limitation period. The Registrar raised no serious objection to revival, provided all outstanding statutory documents were filed with applicable fees. Restoration under section 560(6) is intended to give the company, its members, and creditors an opportunity to revive the company where restoration is necessary in the interests of justice. The Court also noted that costs ordinarily follow the petition under rule 94 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.
Conclusion: The company's name was ordered to be restored to the register, subject to payment of costs and completion of all statutory formalities, including late fees and other charges.
Ratio Decidendi: A company struck off from the register may be restored under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 where it is shown to be a continuing business and restoration is in the interests of justice, subject to compliance with statutory formalities and appropriate costs.