Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether brass dross imported by the appellant was a restricted item requiring an import licence and, if not hazardous waste, whether confiscation and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The classification entry had to be read as a whole, with the policy column and the column containing the conditions of import read together. On that reading, brass dross was restricted only when it answered the description of hazardous waste and was importable only against a licence for processing or reuse. The sample drawn in this case was found not to contain any water-soluble chemical compound and therefore did not fall within the hazardous waste category under the applicable waste rules framed under the environmental statute.
Conclusion: Brass dross which is not hazardous waste is not a restricted import requiring a licence, and the confiscation and penalty were unsustainable; the appeal was allowed.