Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue made out a prima facie case for stay of the order of the lower appellate authority in a customs valuation dispute.
Analysis: The controversy concerned the assessable value of an imported vessel. The Revenue contended that the price agreed after the importation could not govern valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act, while the respondents relied on Rule 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The Tribunal noted that the lower price was not available at the time of importation and that the Revenue had shown a strong prima facie case on the valuation issue.
Conclusion: Stay of the impugned order was granted in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For customs valuation, a price agreed after importation does not, on the face of the record, displace the prima facie applicability of the price available at the time of importation for purposes of stay consideration under Section 14 of the Customs Act.