Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery of the confirmed central excise duty and penalty should be stayed during the pendency of the appeal in view of the applicant's claim of eligibility to deemed credit.
Analysis: The applicants sought waiver of pre-deposit contending that the supplier had discharged the duty liability and that they were entitled to avail credit under the relevant notification. The Tribunal noted that the supplier had discharged the duty on the raw material and that, on the material placed before it, the applicants had made out a strong prima facie case supported by the cited High Court decision. In such circumstances, the balance of convenience justified protection against coercive recovery pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: Recovery of the duty and penalty was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.