Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the seizure of goods on the ground of alleged non-accountal was sustainable and whether the Commissioner (Appeals) was right in vacating the seizure.
Analysis: The factory records were complete up to the previous day, and the excess material was found on the date of the officers' visit while the factory was functioning. Under Trade Notice No. 66/95 dated 25-8-95, production for the date of visit could be entered at the end of the day. In those circumstances, the goods could not be treated as unaccounted merely because they had not yet been entered in the record at the time of inspection.
Conclusion: The seizure for alleged non-accountal was not justified, and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) vacating the seizure was upheld in favour of the assessee.