Line rejects returned after manufacture are covered by Rule 57D and not treated as inputs cleared as such.

Goods returned to the supplier as line rejects after issue for manufacture were treated as rejected inputs, not as inputs cleared as such. On that factual basis, Rule 57D of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied, and no duty liability or credit reversal arose. The Department failed to prove that the goods were removed from the factory as such, so Rule 57F(3) was not attracted. The Revenue's challenge therefore failed, and the relief granted to the assessee was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether duty was payable on line rejects returned to the supplier after issue for manufacture, and whether Rule 57D or Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of the goods removed from the factory. The Department's case was that the inputs had been cleared as such, attracting Rule 57F(3). The record, however, showed that what was returned were line rejects, namely inputs rejected after being issued for manufacture. The Department did not establish by evidence that the goods were removed as such. Once the removals were accepted as line rejects, the transaction fell within Rule 57D, under which no duty liability or credit reversal arose in the facts of the case.

Conclusion: Duty was not payable on the line rejects, and Rule 57F(3) was not attracted; the assessee succeeded on this issue.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue challenge failed, and the order granting relief to the assessee was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods returned from the factory are proved to be line rejects arising after issue for manufacture, and not inputs removed as such, Rule 57D applies and no duty demand or credit reversal can be sustained under Rule 57F(3).

---