Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on welding electrodes used for repairing machinery and whether, for the period January 2001 to February 2001, such electrodes qualified as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: Credit had been allowed for the period after 1-3-2001 on the basis that welding electrodes were inputs used in the manufacture of capital goods, even though the actual use was for repairs. No cross appeal challenged that finding. On the same reasoning, the use of welding electrodes in repairs resulted in the material becoming embedded in and integrally joined to the machinery. The embedded material was treated as part of the machinery, and therefore the welding electrodes were held to fall within the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q even for the earlier period.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on welding electrodes was admissible for January 2001 to February 2001, and the denial of credit for that period was unsustainable.