Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on L.D.O. used as fuel in boilers for generating steam used in the manufacture of confectionery, despite the steam being an exempt product and notwithstanding the amendment to Rule 57D with effect from 18-3-1995.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the fuel was an input used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final products. The steam generated from burning L.D.O. was used in the production process of confectionery. The amendment to Rule 57D, which specifically dealt with inputs used for generation of electricity or steam, was held to have no bearing on the claim, because the admissibility of credit flowed from the nature of the fuel's use in the manufacturing process itself. The fact that steam was treated as an exempt product did not prevent the input credit where the steam participated in the manufacture of the final goods.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on L.D.O. was admissible and the disallowance by the lower authorities was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded and the denial of credit was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Fuel used to generate steam employed in the manufacturing process qualifies as an input used in or in relation to manufacture, and credit cannot be denied merely because the steam is treated as an exempt intermediate product.