Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a nominee under Section 45ZA(2) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, becomes the owner of the deposit to the exclusion of the deceased depositor's legal heirs, or only acquires the right to receive the amount and hold it subject to succession.
Analysis: Section 45ZA(2) gives the nominee the right to receive the deposit on the death of the depositor and places the nominee in the depositor's shoes for that limited purpose. The provision is part of banking law and does not deal with succession. The money received by the nominee does not cease to form part of the deceased depositor's estate and must devolve according to the applicable rule of succession. The reasoning is reinforced by the materially similar provision in Section 6(1) of the Government Saving Certificate Act, 1959.
Conclusion: The nominee is not the owner of the bank deposit and cannot exclude the other legal heirs from claiming succession rights. The claim of exclusive ownership was rejected.