Pre-deposit waiver in valuation dispute granted on strong prima facie case and revenue neutrality across related manufacturing units.

A pre-deposit waiver was granted in an interim appeal where the dispute concerned valuation and a claim of revenue neutrality within the same company's manufacturing units. The record showed substantial duty had already been paid from PLA at one unit, and on the department's proposed valuation that payment would not have arisen if duty had been discharged at the other unit. Because the appellants made out a strong prima facie case and insisting on pre-deposit would create an unnecessary financial burden, complete waiver was allowed and recovery of the disputed demand was stayed pending final hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether complete waiver of pre-deposit was justified pending appeal in view of the valuation dispute and the plea of revenue neutrality.

Analysis: The appellants showed that both manufacturing units were within the same company and that substantial duty had already been paid from PLA at the Daman unit, even though such payment would not have arisen if duty had been discharged at the Talasari unit on the valuation now proposed by the department. The valuation dispute was left open for final hearing, but the material placed on record indicated a strong case for the appellants at the interim stage. On these facts, the financial burden of insisting on pre-deposit was considered unnecessary, and the demand could not be enforced pending disposal of the appeals.

Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was granted, and recovery of the disputed amount was stayed pending final hearing of the appeals.

---