Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 applied when the assessee had stopped manufacturing non-alloy steel ingots and billets, intimated the department, and shifted to manufacture of other cast articles, and whether the demand based on annual capacity could be sustained.
Analysis: The records showed that the assessee had intimated the jurisdictional excise officers about closure of the factory for a part of the relevant period and the subsequent stoppage of production of non-alloy steel ingots and billets, along with a switch to other cast products. Those intimations were verified by the Superintendent and Assistant Commissioner and were acted upon by the department. In that situation, the mere existence of moulds or a prior determination of annual capacity did not establish actual manufacture of the notified goods. As the assessee was not manufacturing non-alloy steel ingots and billets, the compounded levy provisions were not attracted.
Conclusion: Section 3A was held inapplicable, and the demand and penalty could not be sustained. The Revenue's appeal failed.