Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the claim for Modvat credit on Mono-layer Polyethylene (agri-film) as capital goods required fresh examination by the original authority.
Analysis: The claim turned on whether the agri-film could be treated as capital goods or as components, spare parts or accessories under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, and whether it qualified on the basis of use as pollution control material. The record did not contain a specific finding on the decisive classification issue, and the original authority had recorded only a prima facie view that the film was neither spare parts nor accessories. The matter therefore required reconsideration in the light of the Board circular relied upon.
Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the original authority for de novo consideration.