Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether higher notional Modvat credit could be denied on the ground that the claim was made beyond six months, in the absence of any specific time-limit in the Modvat Rules.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the Modvat scheme contained no express stipulation prescribing a period of limitation for taking credit. The appellants had already claimed normal Modvat credit and had furnished the relevant gate passes with the RT-12 returns, and those gate passes disclosed that the inputs were procured from a small-scale unit enjoying the benefit of Notification No. 175/86. On that basis, the entitlement to higher notional credit was treated as having been effectively asserted when the returns and gate passes were filed. The Tribunal also reiterated its consistent view that, in the absence of a specific restriction in the Modvat Rules, credit could not be denied merely on the ground of delay.
Conclusion: The six-month limitation was held inapplicable, and the denial of higher notional Modvat credit was not sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Modvat Rules do not prescribe a specific time-limit, and the entitlement to credit is already disclosed through the contemporaneous filing of the relevant returns and documents, credit cannot be denied merely on the ground that the higher claim was made after six months.