Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court approves Companies Act scheme of arrangement for family settlement</h1> The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement/reconstruction/reorganization under sections 394 and 100 of the Companies Act, 1956, involving a ... Compromise and arrangement - Held that:- The scheme of arrangement/reconstruction/reorganisation of the companies is also in order and is for larger public interest as also for the interest of shareholders of the transferor/demerged and transferee-companies who are the members of the same clan. The scheme is in accordance with the family settlement and memorandum of understanding duly executed by the members of the family. The scheme is for better economic growth of the companies and also aims at creating harmony amongst the members of the family, besides providing opportunities to the respective shareholders of the transferee-companies to take independent decision and to exploit their individual potential for the better and effective growth of the companies fallen to their shares. It has also been stated that there are no proceedings or investigations pending against the companies under sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act 1956. No person has objected to the sanction of the scheme after notice of the petition was published in two newspapers and Official Gazette of Punjab Government. Thus allow this petition and sanction the scheme of agreement/reconstruction/reorganisation. Issues Involved:1. Sanction of the scheme of arrangement/reconstruction/reorganization under section 394, read with section 100, of the Companies Act, 1956.2. Compliance with procedural requirements including valuation reports and notices to stakeholders.3. Consideration of objections raised by the Regional Director.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement/Reconstruction/Reorganization:The petition filed under section 394, read with section 100, of the Companies Act, 1956, and rule 79 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, seeks the sanction of a scheme involving the transferor-company, M/s. Niranjan Singh Kartar Singh Forgings (P.) Ltd., and seven transferee-companies. The scheme aims to implement a family settlement for the distribution of assets and segregation of business among the family members, thereby resolving disputes and ensuring independent business operations. The transferor-company's board and shareholders had previously authorized the scheme, and all shareholders and the sole unsecured creditor provided no objections through affidavits.2. Compliance with Procedural Requirements:The transferor-company and each transferee-company provided details of their incorporation, share capital, and resolutions passed by their boards and shareholders to accept the scheme. The transferor-company's units are to be taken over by the transferee-companies as per the scheme. Notices were published in The Tribune (English), Punjab Kesri (Hindi), and the Punjab Government Official Gazette, and reports were received from the Official Liquidator and the Regional Director. The Regional Director initially raised an objection regarding the valuation report, but a subsequent valuation report by a licensed chartered accountant was accepted, ensuring compliance with the legal requirements.3. Consideration of Objections Raised by the Regional Director:The Regional Director's objection pertained to the valuation report, which was initially prepared by M/s. V.V. Bhalla & Co. and later by M/s. K.K. Bector & Co. The court considered the additional affidavit and found that the valuation report prepared by the authorized chartered accountant was in order. Therefore, no formal rectification was deemed necessary, and the valuation report was accepted.Conclusion:The court concluded that the scheme of arrangement/reconstruction/reorganization was in the larger public interest and beneficial for the shareholders of the transferor and transferee-companies. The scheme aligns with the family settlement and memorandum of understanding, aiming for better economic growth and harmony among family members. No objections were raised after the publication of notices, and there were no pending proceedings or investigations against the companies under sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, the court sanctioned the scheme and ordered its implementation from the effective date, with a notice of the order to be published in The Indian Express (English), Dainik Bhaskar (Hindi), and the Official Gazette of the Government of Punjab within 30 days. The court also allowed any interested person to approach for necessary directions and ordered the drawing of a formal sanction order in accordance with the law.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found