Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 36/97-Cus. dated 01.04.1997 was available to imported spare parts used to replace defective or worn out parts of machinery under the DEEC scheme.
Analysis: The denial of exemption was based on the view that the notification covered only components and not spares. That approach was unsustainable because the controlling principle was that a spare part, when imported for replacement of a defective or worn out part, becomes a component of the machine. The earlier tribunal view relied upon by the Commissioner (Appeals) had been founded on an overruled decision and could not govern the issue. The later authoritative position, along with the Board circular issued on that basis, supported allowance of the exemption to such spare parts.
Conclusion: The imported spare parts were eligible for the benefit of the exemption notification, and the denial of such benefit was incorrect.
Ratio Decidendi: Spare parts imported for replacement of defective or worn out machinery parts are to be treated as components of the machine and are entitled to exemption where the notification extends to components.