Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed reduction of share capital, forming part of the scheme of amalgamation, should be confirmed and the minutes of reduction approved for registration.
Analysis: The company was authorised by its articles to reduce share capital, and the reduction had been approved by the shareholders by special resolution. The reduction formed an integral part of the scheme of amalgamation, under which cross-holdings were to be cancelled and the reduced amount credited to the general reserve account. The creditors were not shown to be prejudiced, and the Regional Director recorded no objection. Reduction of share capital is treated as a matter of domestic concern, and the court's role is to ensure that the proposal is fair and not inequitable and that creditor interests are protected. On the facts, no legal impediment or valid ground existed to refuse confirmation.
Conclusion: The proposed reduction of share capital was approved, and the minutes to be registered under section 103(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 were sanctioned.