1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court dismisses Revenue's appeal on section 80-I relief withdrawal under Income-tax Act</h1> The High Court of Delhi dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's order for the assessment year 1992-93. The issue was ... Mistake apparent on the record - a mistake apparent on the record within the meaning of section 154 of the Act must be an 'obvious' and 'patent' mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably two opinions β Therefore, a part of the relief granted to the respondent/assessee under section 80-I could not be withdrawn by taking recourse of section 154 The High Court of Delhi dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's order regarding the assessment year 1992-93. The issue was whether relief under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act could be withdrawn using section 154. The Tribunal concluded that since the entitlement to deduction under section 80-I was debatable, it could not be considered a mistake under section 154. The appeal was dismissed based on the Supreme Court's interpretation that a mistake under section 154 must be obvious and not debatable.