Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a personal computer used by a manufacturer of computer parts and accessories qualified as capital goods for the purpose of Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules for the period prior to 31-5-1995.
Analysis: For the relevant period, capital goods covered machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about a change in any substance for manufacture of the final products. The respondents produced no evidence to show that the personal computer was used in or in relation to manufacture of the final product. The only basis pressed was that it functioned as testing equipment. Testing equipment was brought within the Modvat scheme only from 16-5-1995 by Notification No. 11/95-C.E., and the later notifications were held to be prospective in nature.
Conclusion: The personal computer was not admissible as capital goods for Modvat credit for the period in question, and the Revenue's challenge succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The allowance of Modvat credit on the personal computer was set aside, and the Revenue's appeal was accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: A capital good claim under Rule 57Q for the pre-amendment period must be supported by evidence of use in or in relation to manufacture, and a later enlargement of the provision operates prospectively only.