TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether persons falling within the categories of directors or other officers under section 454(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, including ex-directors and nominee directors, can be required to furnish and verify the statement of affairs. (ii) Whether the official liquidator must obtain prior sanction or approval of the company court before initiating action under section 454(5) and (5A). (iii) How the expression "without reasonable excuse" operates and where the burden lies in proceedings for default under section 454.
Issue (i): Whether persons falling within the categories of directors or other officers under section 454(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, including ex-directors and nominee directors, can be required to furnish and verify the statement of affairs.
Analysis: The liability under section 454 is linked to the relevant date and to the statutory descriptions in section 454(2). The definition of director in section 2(13) is inclusive and turns on the position occupied, not merely on the label attached. A resignation letter or entries in Form No. 32 are not conclusive on the question whether a person was a director at the relevant time. Persons who were within the statutory classes and were connected with the affairs of the company at the relevant date may be called upon to furnish the statement of affairs.
Conclusion: Such persons can be proceeded against if they answer the statutory description on the relevant date; the plea of ex-directorship or nominee status does not by itself exclude liability.
Issue (ii): Whether the official liquidator must obtain prior sanction or approval of the company court before initiating action under section 454(5) and (5A).
Analysis: The expression "subject to the directions of the court" in section 454(2) regulates the exercise of power by the official liquidator, but it does not create a requirement of prior sanction. The scheme of the Act distinguishes between directions and express prior permission, and where prior sanction is intended the statute says so in specific terms. The official liquidator therefore does not need advance approval from the company court before lodging a complaint for default under section 454.
Conclusion: Prior sanction is not required; the official liquidator may initiate action subject to the court's directions.
Issue (iii): How the expression "without reasonable excuse" operates and where the burden lies in proceedings for default under section 454.
Analysis: The initial burden lies on the official liquidator to show that the statement of affairs was not filed within the prescribed time and that the facility to prepare it existed. Once that foundational default is shown, the onus shifts to the person proceeded against to establish a reasonable excuse. Whether a reasonable excuse exists is a matter of evidence and must be judged on the facts of each case.
Conclusion: The liquidator must establish default first, after which the accused must show reasonable excuse.
Final Conclusion: The decision lays down controlling guidelines for all pending matters under section 454, affirming the liability of persons falling within the statutory classes, rejecting the need for prior sanction, and clarifying the evidentiary approach to default and reasonable excuse.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956, liability to furnish the statement of affairs attaches to persons who answer the statutory description on the relevant date, the official liquidator need not obtain prior sanction before initiating proceedings, and once non-filing is shown the burden shifts to the accused to establish reasonable excuse.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
