1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Petition challenging ex parte order rejection dismissed, advised to appeal under Income-tax Act</h1> The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for recall of an ex parte order by the Income-tax ... Maintainability of appeal - petitioner's appeals had been dismissed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal by an ex parte order. The petitioner filed an application for recall of that order and that application has been rejected by the impugned order dated October 9, 2003, against which the present writ petition has been filed β words used in section 260A(1) are wide enough to include orders of the nature of the impugned order - words used in section 260A are 'every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal β Thus, held that appeal to High Court against dismissal of the application for recalling order passed ex parte by the tribunal is maintainable The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for recall of an ex parte order by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that an appeal lies under section 260A of the Income-tax Act for orders like the one in question. The petitioner was advised to pursue the alternative remedy of filing an appeal under section 260A(1).