Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-C.E. dated 01.03.1986 was to be computed separately for each product falling under different tariff headings up to the prescribed limit, or whether the clearances of the products had to be clubbed for applying the overall exemption ceiling.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the issue was governed by its earlier decision interpreting the same notification. On that interpretation, where a manufacturer produces specified goods under more than one heading, the fact that the limit for one item is exceeded does not deny exemption to the other goods so long as the overall ceiling for first clearances has not been crossed. The notification was read as permitting exemption until the aggregate ceiling is reached, rather than requiring immediate denial of exemption to all goods once the limit for one item is exhausted.
Conclusion: The exemption was to be applied with reference to the aggregate ceiling for first clearances, and not by clubbing the two items so as to deny the benefit to the other goods prematurely. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the notification, exhaustion of the exemption limit for one specified product does not automatically forfeit exemption for other specified goods until the overall ceiling for first clearances is reached.