Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings could be quashed against the petitioner on the ground that he had resigned from the company long before the alleged default and had no connection with the company's affairs during the relevant period.
Analysis: The petitioner produced the resignation letter and acceptance thereof, showing that he had ceased to be associated with the company years before the financial year in question. The resignation was also communicated to the complainant. In these circumstances, the Court found that the petitioner had no role in the company's affairs during the period relating to the alleged non-filing of the annual return and could not be fastened with criminal liability for the default alleged against the company and its officers. The plea that the offence was continuing did not alter this position as against a person who had already severed his connection with the company.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not liable to face the criminal proceedings and the quash petition was allowed in his favour.
Ratio Decidendi: A former director who had validly resigned and whose resignation had been accepted and communicated cannot be subjected to prosecution for a company default occurring after he had ceased to be in charge of or responsible for the company's affairs.