Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and stay of recovery in respect of individual ceramic pieces used in mosaic tiles.
Analysis: The demand related to glazed and unglazed ceramic pieces classified under Chapter Headings 69.06/69.05 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The record, as noticed in the remand order, did not show any sale or purchase of the disputed goods, and the material relied upon by the department on marketability was not disclosed to the appellants. The Tribunal also noted that the appellants had paid duty on the complete mosaic tiles under Chapter Heading 68.07 for the relevant later period, which supported prima facie availability of captive consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95.
Conclusion: A strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out, and pre-deposit of duty was dispensed with with stay of recovery pending the appeals.