Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty and whether any partial deposit should be directed on the ground of financial hardship.
Analysis: The dispute arose from late payment of central excise duty under the compounded levy scheme. The appellant relied on prior payment of duty with interest and on a decision suggesting that penalty was not imposable, while the Revenue relied on the statutory mandate under the Central Excise Rules that delayed payment attracted penalty. The Tribunal found that the delay in payment was undisputed and that a prima facie case for complete waiver of the penalty was not made out. It also found that the financial material did not establish undue hardship, since the appellant had earned income and the carried-forward loss was limited.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, and the appellant was directed to deposit a part of the penalty amount, with waiver and stay granted for the balance on compliance.