Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was available to M.S. round bars manufactured from old and discarded railway material purchased in auction.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured from old and used railway material such as rails, wheels and fish plates purchased from Railway auction. The governing notification exempted M.S. round bars manufactured from rollable or re-rollable material recognisable as duty paid. The material auctioned by the Railways was treated as duty paid on the basis of the legal position settled by higher judicial authority, and the duty-paid nature of such auctioned material was required to be presumed under the notification. Following that settled interpretation, the exemption could not be denied merely because the inputs were old railway scrap.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was available to the appellant, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded because the manufactured goods qualified for exemption under the notification on the footing that the railway auction material was to be treated as duty paid.
Ratio Decidendi: Where exempt goods are manufactured from railway auction material that is treated as duty paid under the notification, the exemption cannot be denied merely because the inputs are old and used scrap.