1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Confirms Correct Classification of Assemblies under Excise Tariff</h1> The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, confirming the correct classification of assemblies under Heading 8417.90 of the Central Excise Tariff. The ... Classifiaction Issues:- Classification of various assemblies under Central Excise Tariff- Interpretation of Section Notes on parts of articles of general use- Application of Section Note 2 to Section XV of the Tariff- Classification of 'Reformer Tubes' under Heading 8417.90 or 7307.00- Duty demands and penalties based on classificationClassification of Assemblies:The Revenue appealed against the classification of different assemblies by the CCE (Appeals) under Heading 8417.90 of the Central Excise Tariff, contending that they should be classified under Heading 7307.00. The assemblies in question included radiant tube assemblies, retort tube assemblies, hearth plate assemblies, reformer tube assemblies, grid assemblies, and furnace rollers with air injection tube assemblies.Interpretation of Section Notes:The primary contention raised by the Revenue was that the classification of the products should be based on Section Notes on parts of articles of general use. The Revenue argued that even if the entities were for specialized use in a particular industry, they should be classified under Heading 7307 as per Note 2 to Section XV.Application of Section Note 2:The Tribunal analyzed Note 2 to Section XV of the Tariff, which defines 'parts of general use' and specifies the articles covered under various headings. The Tribunal noted that the entity 'Reformer Tubes' did not fall under the classification of fittings for joining pipes or end closures under Heading 7307, as they were assemblies of tubes with caps, cocks, and valves, arranged as per design specifications.Classification of 'Reformer Tubes':The Tribunal examined the manufacturer's catalogue, which described the 'Reformer Tubes' as assemblies of tubes with caps, cocks, and valves, differing in design and composition, and used in various industries. The Tribunal concluded that these tubes did not resemble products classified under Heading 7307, as they were not merely fittings for joining pipes or end closures. Therefore, the exclusion from Chapter 84 based on Section Note 2 was deemed inappropriate.Duty Demands and Penalties:The Tribunal further observed that once the classification of the 'Reformer Tubes' was confirmed under Heading 8417.90, there could be no valid duty demands or penalties imposed. The CCE (Appeals) had correctly classified the tubes under Heading 8417.90 after considering all relevant factors and issues, and this classification was upheld by the Tribunal, leading to the allowance of the appeal by the Revenue.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Revenue, emphasizing the correct classification of the assemblies under Heading 8417.90 and rejecting the duty demands and penalties based on the classification under Heading 7307.