1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Textile fabric processor's penalty reduced from Rs. 11,25,000 to Rs. 25,000 for duty payment delays</h1> The Tribunal found the imposition of a substantial penalty on a textile fabric processor for delays in duty payment unjustified, reducing it from Rs. ... Penalty - Delay in deposit of duty Issues:1. Imposition of penalty for delay in payment of duty by a textile fabric processor.Analysis:The appellant, a textile fabric processor, was required to pay duty at compounded rates based on machinery production capacity. The appellant faced financial difficulties leading to delays in payment, for which a penalty of Rs. 11,25,000/- was imposed by lower authorities. The appellant argued that the penalty was excessive considering the short delays ranging from 1 to 28 days and the payment of interest at 24% for the period of delay.The appellant cited precedents from the Tribunal in cases like J.K. Processors v. CCE and Supertik Industries v. C.C.E., where it was held that imposing the maximum penalty was not necessary. After reviewing the submissions and records, the Tribunal acknowledged that the duty amounts were paid, and the delays were minimal, with interest compensating the Revenue for the delay. Consequently, the Tribunal found the imposition of a substantial penalty unjustified and reduced it to Rs. 25,000/-, partially allowing the appeal to that extent.