Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to exemption under sub-heading 4802.10 of Chapter 48 of the Central Excise Tariff Act on supplies made to the Delhi Bureau of Text Books, and whether the conditions in Para 1(a) of the Note appended to that sub-heading were satisfied.
Analysis: The goods supplied were writing and printing paper falling under Chapter 48. The record showed that the Delhi Bureau of Text Books was wholly owned and organised by the Government of NCT of Delhi, so the objection that it was not a Government-owned body was unsustainable. Although the purchase order was initially placed by the Secretary of the Bureau, it was subsequently countersigned by the Chairman, who was the Special Secretary of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi. On that basis, the requirement that the purchase order be placed by the specified authority was treated as fulfilled. The appellants had therefore supplied the goods against a valid order from the eligible State-owned body within the scope of the exemption entry.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the exemption under sub-heading 4802.10, and the denial of the benefit was unjustified.