TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether waste and scrap of copper generated in the manufacture of the assessee's own goods was eligible for clearance at the concessional rate under Notification No. 1/93. (ii) Whether waste and scrap generated from Modvat inputs received under Notification No. 214/86 and Rule 57F(3) procedures could be demanded from the job worker.
Issue (i): Waste and scrap arising from the assessee's own manufacture was examined in the context of the small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93.
Analysis: The clearance of such waste and scrap, when generated from the assessee's own production, was treated as falling within the concessional duty framework available under the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to clear the waste and scrap from its own manufacture at the concessional rate under Notification No. 1/93.
Issue (ii): Liability for duty on waste and scrap generated from inputs received for job work under Notification No. 214/86 and Rule 57F(3) was considered.
Analysis: Such waste and scrap was treated as arising from Modvat inputs belonging to the supplier, and not as goods of the job worker. The duty liability was therefore held to attach to the supplier of the inputs, not to the job worker, and the demand raised on the job worker was found to be misdirected.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable for the duty demand on waste and scrap generated from the supplied Modvat inputs.
Final Conclusion: The duty demand on the entire quantity of waste and scrap could not be sustained and the assessee succeeded in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where scrap is generated from inputs received for job work under the prescribed notification and procedure, duty liability rests with the supplier of the inputs and not with the job worker; scrap from the assessee's own manufacture may be cleared under the applicable small scale exemption.
TaxTMI 
