Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Court affirms bank's right to sell NPAs under RBI guidelines, limits judicial intervention</h1> The court upheld respondent No. 1's entitlement to sell its non-performing assets (NPAs) under RBI guidelines, rejecting the appellant's claims for prior ... Power of Reserve Bank to give directions Issues Involved:1. Entitlement of respondent No. 1 to sell its non-performing assets (NPAs) under RBI guidelines.2. Requirement of notice to the appellant before disposing of its financial assets.3. Consideration of the appellant's offer for one-time settlement (OTS) vis-`a-vis the highest bidder's offer.4. Binding nature of RBI guidelines.5. Jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 in contractual matters.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement of respondent No. 1 to sell its non-performing assets (NPAs) under RBI guidelines:The court upheld that respondent No. 1 is entitled to sell its NPAs to other banking institutions or financial institutions under the guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The guidelines, issued vide Circular No. RBI/2005-06/54 DBOD. No.BP.BC 16/21.04.048/2005-2006, dated 13-7-2005, were found to be binding on respondent No. 1. The court noted that these guidelines are designed to increase the options available to banks for resolving their NPAs and to develop a healthy secondary market for NPAs.2. Requirement of notice to the appellant before disposing of its financial assets:The court rejected the appellant's claim that it was entitled to prior notice before the sale of its NPAs. It was clarified that the NPAs are debts owed by the appellant to respondent No. 1, and therefore, respondent No. 1 is entitled to deal with these debts as its assets. The RBI guidelines do not mandate prior notice to the debtor before the sale of NPAs, and respondent No. 1 complied with these guidelines in its actions.3. Consideration of the appellant's offer for one-time settlement (OTS) vis-`a-vis the highest bidder's offer:The appellant argued that its offer of Rs. 520 lakhs should have been accepted as it was higher than the highest bid of Rs. 501 lakhs. The court held that no party can be directed to enter into an OTS, as it requires mutual agreement. The appellant had previously failed to honor an OTS offer, and the court found no basis to compel respondent No. 1 to accept a subsequent offer. The court emphasized that the decision to accept or reject an OTS is a commercial decision that cannot be interfered with by the court.4. Binding nature of RBI guidelines:The court affirmed the binding nature of the RBI guidelines, referencing the Supreme Court judgments in B.O.I. Finance Ltd. v. Custodian and Central Bank of India v. Ravindra. These judgments established that RBI guidelines have statutory force and are binding on banking institutions. The guidelines are intended to ensure proper management and resolution of NPAs, and respondent No. 1 was obligated to comply with them.5. Jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 in contractual matters:The court reiterated that the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution are broad but should not be used to interfere in commercial decisions unless there is a violation of law or unfairness. The court cited several judgments, including Orissa State Financial Corpn. v. Narsingh Ch. Nayak and Haryana Financial Corpn. v. Jagadamba Oil Mills, to support the principle that writs of mandamus are not appropriate for enforcing contractual matters. The court concluded that the appellant failed to demonstrate any public duty being discharged by respondent No. 1 that warranted judicial intervention.Conclusion:The court found no merit in the appellant's claims and upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that respondent No. 1 acted within its rights under the RBI guidelines and that the appellant's offer for OTS could not be enforced through a writ petition. The court emphasized the importance of respecting commercial decisions made by financial institutions in compliance with regulatory guidelines.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found