Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents had ceased to be directors before the winding up order and were therefore not liable to file the statement of affairs under section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The respondents produced material showing that intimation of cessation of directorship had been sent to the Registrar of Companies along with Form No. 32 before the winding up order. The official liquidator's verification also showed that two Forms No. 32 had been filed and taken on record, though the supporting particulars were no longer available because the records had been destroyed. On this basis, the cessation of directorship prior to the winding up order was accepted, and the obligation to file the statement of affairs was held inapplicable to respondents Nos. 1 to 3.
Conclusion: The respondents were not liable to file the statement of affairs, and the application for penal action failed.