Quashing of criminal proceedings where the foundational departmental order is set aside by the appellate tribunal.

Criminal proceedings under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 were based entirely on a departmental penalty order alleging failure to realise export proceeds. That foundation vanished when the Appellate Tribunal set aside the underlying order, so the alleged contravention could no longer be sustained. The High Court applied the settled principle that inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 may be used sparingly, but can be invoked where continuation of proceedings would amount to abuse of process and quashing is necessary to secure the ends of justice. The proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether criminal proceedings for alleged contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could continue when the departmental order forming the basis of the complaint had been set aside by the Appellate Tribunal; and whether the High Court should exercise its inherent power to quash the proceedings.

Analysis: The complaint was founded on the order of the Special Director imposing penalty for the alleged failure to realise export proceeds. That order was subsequently set aside by the Appellate Tribunal constituted under the statute, so the foundation for the prosecution ceased to exist. In such circumstances, the alleged contravention could not be sustained on the basis of an order that no longer survived. The Court applied the settled principle that inherent powers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are to be used sparingly, but may be invoked where continuation of proceedings would amount to abuse of process and quashing is required to secure the ends of justice.

Conclusion: The proceedings were liable to be quashed and the petition succeeded.

Final Conclusion: The criminal case could not be allowed to proceed after the very order on which it was based had been annulled by the competent appellate forum, and the High Court intervened to prevent abuse of process.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a prosecution under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 is founded entirely on a departmental order that has been set aside by the competent appellate authority, the basis of the complaint disappears and the criminal proceedings are liable to be quashed in exercise of inherent jurisdiction.

---