Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was admissible on the heat pump/compressor installed for maintaining temperature, or whether it fell within the excluded category of compressors used in refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of the exclusion attached to capital goods credit. The claimed item was treated as a heat pump and the record did not show that it was of the type of compressor specifically excluded from the credit scheme. The exclusion was not demonstrated to cover all compressors indiscriminately, and no material was produced to show that the particular equipment answered the excluded description.
Conclusion: The credit was admissible and the Revenue challenge failed.