Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods cleared to the domestic tariff area under permission granted by the Development Commissioner were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 2/95, dated 04-01-1995, and whether the matter required fresh adjudication in view of the later drop of proceedings by the Development Commissioner and the improved export performance.
Analysis: The notification covered goods exported as well as goods expected to be exported, and the exemption was subject to satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner regarding the prescribed conditions. In the circumstances noted by the record, the Development Commissioner had dropped the proceedings and the appellants' export performance had improved subsequently. These developments justified reconsideration of the demand and required a fresh decision by the original adjudicating authority after giving the appellants a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with opportunity of hearing to the appellants.