Appeal by partner in personal name held not maintainable where adjudication and penalty were passed against the firm.

Where adjudication is made against a firm, the appeal must be filed in the firm's own name because the firm is the entity against which the order operates. An appeal presented only by a partner in his personal capacity is not maintainable when no personal penalty or adverse order has been passed against him. On the facts, the show cause notice and order-in-original were issued against the firm, while the appeal was filed in the individual name of a partner/managing partner. The dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore upheld as valid.

---

---

Issues: Whether an appeal filed in the personal name of a partner/managing partner, instead of in the name of the firm against which the adjudication order was passed, was maintainable.

Analysis: The show cause notice and the adjudication proceedings were against the firm, and the order-in-original imposed confiscation and penalty on the firm. No personal penalty or other adverse order had been passed against the individual who filed the appeal. The record showed that the appeal had been presented in his own name, and not by the firm in its own name. A firm is a legal entity capable of suing and being sued in its own name, and an appeal by one partner in his personal capacity cannot be treated as an appeal by the firm itself.

Conclusion: The appeal filed in the individual name was not maintainable against the order passed on the firm, and the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) was /valid.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the adjudication is against a firm, an appeal must be filed by the firm in its own name; an appeal presented only by a partner in his personal capacity does not confer maintainability in the absence of an order against him personally.

---