Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dispute arising from a securities transaction with a Bombay Stock Exchange member, even when one party is a non-member, is governed by the Exchange bye-laws so as to require reference to arbitration and exclude the civil court's jurisdiction.
Analysis: The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 empowers a recognized stock exchange to frame bye-laws regulating contracts in securities, including contracts between a member and a non-member, and the Exchange bye-laws create a deeming framework under which such contracts are subject to the Rules, Bye-laws, Regulations and usage of the Exchange. The relevant bye-laws further deem all claims and disputes arising out of such contracts to be referred to arbitration and treat acceptance of the contract as an arbitration agreement. The expression "non-member" is used in an inclusive and wide sense, and the scheme is intended to operate as a complete code for transactions in securities, leaving no room for an alternate civil remedy in respect of disputes covered by the bye-laws.
Conclusion: The dispute was held to be arbitrable under the Exchange bye-laws and the civil court had no jurisdiction to try it.