Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the proposed scheme of amalgamation satisfied the statutory requirements and deserved sanction under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. (ii) Whether the surplus arising on amalgamation was required to be dealt with in accordance with Accounting Standard (AS-14), including the treatment of resultant reserves.
Issue (i): Whether the proposed scheme of amalgamation satisfied the statutory requirements and deserved sanction under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.
Analysis: The necessary notices were duly served and published, the Official Liquidator and Regional Director were heard, no objection was raised by any stakeholder, and the transferor company had disclosed all material facts. The record showed compliance with the conditions governing amalgamation, and no investigation or disqualifying circumstance was shown to exist.
Conclusion: The scheme satisfied the statutory requirements and was sanctioned.
Issue (ii): Whether the surplus arising on amalgamation was required to be dealt with in accordance with Accounting Standard (AS-14), including the treatment of resultant reserves.
Analysis: The Regional Director's objection was that the surplus should not be treated as general reserve. The accounting standard applicable to amalgamation distinguishes between merger and purchase methods, and in an amalgamation in the nature of merger the identity of reserves is preserved. The Court accepted that the amalgamation fell within the nature of merger and that the resultant reserves had to be given the treatment prescribed by AS-14.
Conclusion: The resultant reserves were directed to be treated in accordance with AS-14, and the reserves available for distribution before amalgamation were to remain available after amalgamation.
Final Conclusion: The scheme of amalgamation was approved, the transferor company stood dissolved without winding up, and the accounting treatment of reserves was regulated by the applicable amalgamation standard.
Ratio Decidendi: A scheme of amalgamation may be sanctioned when the statutory procedure is complied with and no objection survives, and in an amalgamation in the nature of merger the identity and distributable character of reserves are preserved in accordance with the applicable accounting standard.