Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Judgment on New Jahangir Vakil Mills' Assets Transfer and Financial Management

        State of Gujarat Versus Official Liquidator of GSTC. Ltd.

        State of Gujarat Versus Official Liquidator of GSTC. Ltd. - [2006] 69 SCL 151 (GUJ.) Issues Involved:

        1. Confirmation of sale of assets of New Jahangir Vakil Mills (NJVM) in liquidation.
        2. Authority of the Official Liquidator to sell land belonging to Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation.
        3. Payment of dues to secured creditors and other creditors.
        4. Discharge of liabilities towards workers.
        5. Transfer of immovable assets to the State Government.
        6. Investigation of fire damage and assessment of damages.
        7. Resolution of inter se disputes between State Government and Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation.
        8. Handling of surplus funds by the Official Liquidator.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Confirmation of Sale of Assets:
        Company Application No. 16 of 2000 filed by 21st Century Developers and Company Application No. 26 of 2000 filed by Mr. Rajabhai K. Kangadh sought confirmation of sale of NJVM's assets. The Court decided that these applications became infructuous due to the decision to transfer the immovable properties to the State Government.

        2. Authority of the Official Liquidator:
        Company Applications Nos. 44 and 186 of 2000 by Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation questioned the Official Liquidator's authority to sell land belonging to the Corporation. These applications were disposed of with the understanding that the inter se disputes between the State Government and the Corporation would be resolved amicably.

        3. Payment of Dues to Creditors:
        Company Application No. 43 of 2000 by State Bank of Saurashtra requested that sale proceeds not be disbursed without first paying the bank's dues. The Court noted that the State Government had already discharged these dues, rendering the application infructuous.

        4. Discharge of Liabilities Towards Workers:
        Company Application No. 268 of 2004 by Mill Kamdar Union sought unpaid wages and Provident Fund dues. The Court noted that the State Government had undertaken to discharge any liabilities towards workers, and since a related Special Civil Application was pending, this application was disposed of without further orders.

        5. Transfer of Immovable Assets:
        Company Application No. 237 of 2004 by the State of Gujarat sought the transfer of NJVM's immovable assets to the State. The Court directed the Official Liquidator to hand over these properties to the State Government, which was the sole secured creditor and major shareholder, subject to the State Government filing an undertaking to discharge any future liabilities.

        6. Investigation of Fire Damage:
        Official Liquidator Report No. 23 of 2004 sought directions to investigate the cause of a fire and assess damages. The Court directed the State Government to pursue the matter with the insurance company and take appropriate action against the purchaser for any damages.

        7. Resolution of Inter Se Disputes:
        The Court acknowledged the inter se disputes between the State Government and Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation regarding the possession of the Mills Company but did not delve into the merits, leaving it to the parties to resolve amicably.

        8. Handling of Surplus Funds:
        The Court directed the Official Liquidator to render accounts of the funds available, retain part for contingencies, and hand over the balance to the State Government. The Official Liquidator was found to have sufficient funds to cover all liabilities, and any excess would be transferred to the State Government.

        Conclusion:
        The Court's comprehensive judgment addressed multiple applications and reports, primarily focusing on the transfer of NJVM's immovable assets to the State Government, the discharge of liabilities, and the handling of surplus funds by the Official Liquidator. The decision aimed to resolve the interconnected issues efficiently, ensuring that the State Government, as the major creditor and shareholder, would manage the remaining assets and liabilities.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found