Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal was maintainable against the order directing prosecution and initiating contempt proceedings.
Analysis: The challenge was directed against findings recorded while rejecting review, on the basis of which the Court had formed an opinion that prosecution and contempt action were warranted. The statutory scheme under section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 permits a court to conduct a preliminary inquiry and lodge a complaint where an offence relating to a document produced in a proceeding appears to have been committed. The appeal against such criminal-process directions was held not to lie under section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. Further, section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides the appellate route against an order refusing to make a complaint to the court to which appeals ordinarily lie, and section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 applies only to an order punishing for contempt, not to mere initiation of contempt proceedings.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable and was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The impugned directions for prosecution and contempt were not open to challenge in the present appeal, and the appellate court declined interference.
Ratio Decidendi: A direction for prosecution under section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or the mere initiation of contempt proceedings is not appealable under section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956, and section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is attracted only after punishment is imposed for contempt.