Modvat credit on processed inputs remained admissible where manufacturing steps made goods marketable and duty had been paid on the final product.

Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs was treated as admissible where the processes of cutting to length, greasing, rewinding on new drums and packing were found necessary to complete the goods and render them marketable. The final product having suffered duty also supported credit eligibility on the inputs used in manufacture. Penalty under Rule 173Q was found unsustainable because there was no proper quantification and no firm finding on manufacture. The Revenue's challenge failed, and the allowance of Modvat credit remained in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit on inputs was admissible when the processes undertaken on the inputs were claimed to amount to manufacture and to bring the goods into marketable form.

Analysis: The inputs were duty-paid semi-finished goods brought into the factory for cutting to length, greasing, rewinding on new drums, and packing for marketing. These processes were treated as necessary to complete the finished product and to render it marketable. The order also noted that the final product had suffered duty, which supported admissibility of credit on the inputs used in its manufacture. The penalty under Rule 173Q was also found unsustainable in the absence of proper quantification and a firm finding on manufacture.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed, leaving the allowance of Modvat credit in favour of the assessee undisturbed.

---