Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturer who exercised the option to avail exemption under Notification No. 9/99-C.E. could withdraw from that option during the remaining part of the financial year.
Analysis: The option under the notification became effective from the date of its exercise and the notification expressly provided that such option shall not be withdrawn during the remaining part of the financial year. The exemption notification had to be construed strictly according to its plain language, and once the manufacturer chose to avail the benefit from 1-4-1999, the terms of the notification bound the assessee for the whole financial year. A fresh declaration and payment of duty at the normal rate could not override the express bar against withdrawal.
Conclusion: The assessee could not withdraw from the notification during the same financial year, and the issue is decided in favour of the Revenue.