TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules driving goggles by Ergo Auto not sunglasses, classified under different tariff heading</h1> <h3>ERGO AUTO LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD</h3> ERGO AUTO LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD - 2004 (166) E.L.T. 60 (Tri. - Del.) Issues involved:Classification of driving goggles manufactured by M/s. Ergo Auto Ltd. under sub-heading 9004.90 or 9004.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Classification under sub-heading 9004.10 or 9004.90The appellant argued that sub-heading 9004.10 applies to sunglasses not used for correcting vision, while sub-heading 9004.90 applies to other spectacles, goggles, etc. The driving goggles are meant for protecting motorcyclists against road hazards, not as fashion sunglasses. They referenced a Tribunal decision stating that sunglasses reduce light transmission and avoid glare.Issue 2: Interpretation of Explanatory NotesThe Departmental Representative countered by referring to the Explanatory Notes of HSN, stating that Heading 9004 includes articles for correcting vision or protecting against various hazards, such as sunglasses for motorists/motorcyclists. Hence, they argued that driving goggles fall under Heading 9004.10.Judgment:The Tribunal analyzed Heading 9004, which includes sub-headings 9004.10 for sunglasses and 9004.90 for other articles. Sunglasses are defined as glasses tinted to protect eyes from sunlight or glare. However, driving goggles serve a dual purpose of protecting against various hazards during day and night for motorcyclists.The Tribunal concluded that driving goggles do not fall under the definition of sunglasses as they are not solely for sunlight protection. The Explanatory Notes mention various types of protective spectacles and goggles separately, including those for motorists and motorcyclists. Therefore, driving goggles are classified under sub-heading 9004.90, not 9004.10.Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and all appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
