Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar had jurisdiction to entertain and decide the appeal when the impugned order was passed, and whether the order passed without jurisdiction was liable to be set aside and the appeal transferred to the competent appellate authority.
Analysis: The appeal had originally been filed when the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar possessed jurisdiction under Notification No. 29/97-Cus. (N.T.) dated 07-07-1997. That notification was later superseded by Notification No. 16/02-Cus. (N.T.) dated 07-03-2002, and thereafter amended by Notification No. 78/02-Cus. (N.T.) dated 05-12-2002, which removed Jalandhar's jurisdiction over appeals arising within the jurisdiction of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Amritsar. By the date of the impugned order, jurisdiction had shifted to Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi-I under Sr. No. (1) of the table annexed to Notification No. 16/02-Cus. (N.T.) dated 07-03-2002, as amended.
Conclusion: The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Jalandhar lacked jurisdiction to pass the impugned order, which was therefore set aside, and the appeal was directed to be transferred to and decided by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi-I.