1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal dismisses Miscellaneous Application challenging Anti-Dumping Duty levy. Applicant lacks standing for appeal.</h1> The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application filed by M/s. Himachal Futuristic Communication Ltd. seeking relevant information against the levy of ... Appeal to Appellate Tribunal - Anti-dumping duty - Aggrieved person Issues:Application for relevant information against levy of Anti-Dumping Duty. Entitlement of the applicant to maintain the application.Analysis:The case involves an application filed by M/s. Himachal Futuristic Communication Ltd. seeking relevant information for making submissions against the levy of Anti-Dumping Duty. The applicant claimed that the information sought is not required to be kept confidential and they are entitled to access it before the Tribunal proceeds with the matter. The Hon'ble Supreme Court's direction in the case of Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Designated Authority is cited, emphasizing the Tribunal's discretion in deciding the confidentiality of materials placed before the Designated Authority.The Tribunal examined whether the applicant is entitled to maintain the application. The applicant sought to rely on a specific paragraph of an order which discussed the possibility of affected parties challenging the levy of anti-dumping duty on all legally available grounds. It was argued that a respondent in the appeals considered by the Tribunal can be transposed as an appellant to contest the confidentiality of certain information to participate effectively in the proceedings.However, the Tribunal found that the applicant was not a respondent in the earlier proceedings and thus could not be transposed as an appellant. Consequently, the applicant was deemed to have no right to claim the information sought in the application. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application filed by M/s. Himachal Futuristic Communication Ltd. regarding the relevant information against the levy of Anti-Dumping Duty.