Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Customs authorities had power under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 to cancel a 'G' Card already granted to an employee on the ground of alleged misconduct in a Regulation 9 examination, and whether such cancellation was justified in the circumstances.
Analysis: The 'G' Card is issued after the person has passed the examination referred to in Regulation 20(3) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984. The Regulations do not contain any provision authorising cancellation of a 'G' Card once granted. The power recognised in Regulation 20(1) relates to approval for appointment of a person by a Customs House Agent, and any power to withdraw that approval cannot be stretched to cancellation of the card itself. The alleged possession of a slip of paper in the examination hall may, at the highest, justify action relating to that examination, but it does not furnish a legal basis for cancelling the card, and the punishment imposed was disproportionate to the alleged lapse.
Conclusion: The cancellation of the 'G' Card was without authority of law and could not stand; the appeal was allowed in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express enabling provision, an administrative authority cannot cancel a duly granted 'G' Card merely because of alleged misconduct in the examination process, especially where the action is disproportionate to the lapse alleged.