Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods was admissible when the assessee produced evidence showing that excise duty had been paid by it and that the duty amount was excluded from the lease arrangement, in compliance with Rule 57R(3) of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The respondents produced a certificate from the manufacturer showing payment of excise duty and also a certificate from the finance company stating that the lease amount did not include excise duty and that the duty was separately paid by the respondents. On the factual record, the duty on the capital goods stood established as paid by the respondents, and the lease agreement did not negate that position. In these circumstances, no infirmity was found in the order dropping the proceedings.
Conclusion: The requirement under Rule 57R(3) was treated as satisfied, and the Revenue's challenge failed.