Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption from duty could be denied when Modvat credit taken on inputs used in exempted final products was reversed before detection, and whether penalty was sustainable.
Analysis: The credit taken on inputs had been reversed on the assessee's own before the departmental visit. On reversal of the Modvat credit, the assessee could not be treated as having retained credit of duty on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods. The condition in the exemption notification that no credit should have been taken was therefore not violated in substance. Since the credit stood reversed voluntarily, the basis for penalty also disappeared.
Conclusion: Exemption could not be denied and penalty was not justified.