Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a financial corporation that took over only the hypothecated assets of a loanee company under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act and later handed those assets back after settlement could be treated as the successor or assign of the company for the purpose of binding liability under section 18(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Analysis: The binding effect of an award under section 18(c) extends to an employer's heirs, successors or assigns in respect of the establishment concerned. The decisive question was whether the corporation had stepped into the shoes of the loanee company in relation to the industrial establishment. The taking over under section 29 was only for recovery of dues against hypothecated assets, not a transfer of the business as a going concern. The assets were later returned to the original company under the settlement and the corporation neither purchased the whole business nor carried it on as an operating concern. In such circumstances, the statutory takeover did not convert the corporation into a transferee of the business or a successor in interest, and the recovery certificate issued against it could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The corporation was not the successor or assign of the loanee company, and the recovery certificate and consequential recovery proceedings were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A mere takeover of hypothecated assets under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, without transfer of the business as a going concern, does not make the corporation a successor or assign of the loanee company for the purpose of fastening liability under section 18(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act.