Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty paid under a technical collaboration agreement was includible in the assessable value of imported lubricating oils when the royalty related to manufacturing and blending technology and not to the imported goods as such.
Analysis: Rule 9(1)(c) permits addition only of royalties and licence fees that are related to the imported goods and that the buyer is required to pay, directly or indirectly, as a condition of sale, to the extent they are not already included in the price actually paid or payable. The agreement showed that the royalty was payable for supply of technical knowledge, services, and know-how for manufacture and blending of Castrol products in India. On that footing, such royalty could not automatically be treated as part of the value of goods imported and sold without any further processing. In the absence of a clause extending the royalty obligation to such imported goods, and without the basic import documents before it, the matter required fresh examination by the appellate authority.
Conclusion: The royalty was not held to be includible in the assessable value merely on the basis of the collaboration agreement, and the issue was remitted for reconsideration on the basis of material to be produced by the appellant.