TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate tribunal rules extended limitation not valid for duty demand, deems one year unjustified.</h1> <h3>TATA TEA LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COCHIN</h3> The appellate tribunal in Bangalore allowed the appeal, ruling that the extended period of limitation was not applicable. The duty demand for one year was ... Demand - Limitation The appellate tribunal in Bangalore allowed the appeal, stating that the extended period of limitation was not applicable as the normal period for issuing show cause notice was six months at the relevant time. The duty demand for a period of one year was not justified, and the appellants had already paid duty for the normal six-month period.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
